Biden Gets a $4 Billion Reminder to Patch Trade Ties With Europe, , on November 11, 2020 at 5:00 am

By
On November 11, 2020
Tags:

(Bloomberg) — Barely 48 hours after President-elect Joe Biden pledged to “make America respected around the world again,” the European Union was among the first in line to remind him that trans-Atlantic trade relations might be a good place to start.Brussels on Monday agreed to put new tariffs on $4 billion worth of U.S. imports, a move taken with the blessing of the World Trade Organization after the EU won a case in Geneva against illegal subsidies to Boeing Co. It was a counter-punch after the U.S., in a parallel filing against Airbus SE, was allowed to impose tariffs on $7.5 billion in goods from nations including France, Germany, Spain and the U.K.The fight preceded President Donald Trump by some 12 years but his “America First” approach only prolonged it. The eye-for-an-eye result reflects what some observers have said is a miscalculation in the Trump administration’s strategy with trade friend and foe alike: Europe didn’t blink under pressure, it hit back.In contrast, Biden’s preference for strengthening democratic alliances could create a more conducive environment to settle festering disputes like the Airbus-Boeing case — one of several festering stalemates.“The U.S. have put on their tariffs, the EU have put on their tariffs. We are on par. It is a good way to start negotiations,” Pascal Lamy, the WTO’s former director general told Bloomberg TV on Tuesday.Years of Stalemate“The question is, would Brussels and Washington agree,” Lamy said. “With Trump the answer was no way. With Biden the answer is yes.”At the same time, Europeans acknowledge that there will remain major disagreements and they must be realistic about Biden’s ability to prioritize the alliance over more pressing domestic matters and longer-term changes in political tides.“Divisions can always be bridged, wounds can be healed,” EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said in a speech Tuesday. “But some shifts in priorities and perceptions run much deeper than one politician or administration. And they will not disappear because of one election.”Here’s a rundown of the other main U.S.-EU disagreements on trade issues:Steel & Aluminum TariffsOne early, trust-building exercise could be a withdrawal of the Trump administration’s national security tariffs on steel and aluminum, which are viewed in Europe as a regrettable indignity.Former White House adviser Clete Willems acknowledged that the tariffs amounted to an “unforced error” by the Trump administration that’s created undue animosity between Washington and Brussels.“Of all the things Trump has done, that was the one that was unnecessary and hurt the relationship in a way that wasn’t productive at all,” Willems said in a phone interview.A move by Biden to end the steel and aluminum tariffs could encourage Brussels to withdraw its retaliatory tariffs on 2.8 billion euros ($3.3 billion) worth of iconic U.S. goods like bourbon whiskey, Harley-Davidson Inc. motorcycles and Levi Strauss & Co. jeans.Industrial Subsidies AccordThe Biden administration could work with the EU, Japan and other like-minded parties to craft new global rules to curb China’s market-distorting government aid.“I believe a Biden Administration will look to confront China and to reassert American leadership,” said Tim Brightbill, a partner at Wiley, a law firm in Washington.The Biden administration could pick up a tentative agreement that the U.S., EU, and Japan advanced in January to target Beijing’s subsidy practices that have been a source of growing trade tensions between Beijing and the rest of the world.If adopted and expanded among a large enough group of nations, the agreement could represent the most significant upgrade of the global trade rulebook in more than a decade.Digital Services TaxAnother key point of friction will continue to be the fight over Europe’s plans to impose digital services taxes, which act as levies on local sales of foreign technology companies like Facebook Inc. and Google.Austria, France, Italy, Spain and the U.K. are among countries that are either adopting or considering digital services taxes to try to gain a greater slice of the $26 trillion worldwide e-commerce marketplace.But the Trump administration argues that the taxes are discriminatory against U.S. internet companies and pledged to impose tariffs of 25% on a series of French goods including makeup, soap and handbags worth about $1.3 billion.The digital tax debate will remain a “major irritant” for Biden, Willems said. “The U.S. views this as Europeans discriminating against U.S. companies to extract revenue from them and claw it back to develop their own national champions.”Climate Change AgreementBiden has also pledged to rejoin the Paris climate agreement, which would be a welcome development for European capitals and could open some opportunities for re-engagement on a stalled trade deal to cut tariffs on environmentally friendly goods.If Biden signals his intent to re-engage on the Environmental Goods Agreement, it could increase global trade in environmental products — like solar panels, water filters, electric motors and hydraulic turbines — by $119 billion a year.Over the long term, there will be a need for the U.S. and Europe to engage on Brussels’ plans for a carbon border-adjustment mechanism that would create new costs for foreign imports from countries that are less strict about reducing pollution.“The U.S. will be moving much more slowly than the EU is committed to do,” Adam Posen, president of the Peterson Institute for International Economics in Washington, said during a recent webinar hosted by Bruegel, a Brussels-based think tank. “There is going to be a trade aspect of border adjustments that we are going to have to talk about.”For more articles like this, please visit us at bloomberg.comSubscribe now to stay ahead with the most trusted business news source.©2020 Bloomberg L.P.,

Biden Gets a $4 Billion Reminder to Patch Trade Ties With Europe(Bloomberg) — Barely 48 hours after President-elect Joe Biden pledged to “make America respected around the world again,” the European Union was among the first in line to remind him that trans-Atlantic trade relations might be a good place to start.Brussels on Monday agreed to put new tariffs on $4 billion worth of U.S. imports, a move taken with the blessing of the World Trade Organization after the EU won a case in Geneva against illegal subsidies to Boeing Co. It was a counter-punch after the U.S., in a parallel filing against Airbus SE, was allowed to impose tariffs on $7.5 billion in goods from nations including France, Germany, Spain and the U.K.The fight preceded President Donald Trump by some 12 years but his “America First” approach only prolonged it. The eye-for-an-eye result reflects what some observers have said is a miscalculation in the Trump administration’s strategy with trade friend and foe alike: Europe didn’t blink under pressure, it hit back.In contrast, Biden’s preference for strengthening democratic alliances could create a more conducive environment to settle festering disputes like the Airbus-Boeing case — one of several festering stalemates.“The U.S. have put on their tariffs, the EU have put on their tariffs. We are on par. It is a good way to start negotiations,” Pascal Lamy, the WTO’s former director general told Bloomberg TV on Tuesday.Years of Stalemate“The question is, would Brussels and Washington agree,” Lamy said. “With Trump the answer was no way. With Biden the answer is yes.”At the same time, Europeans acknowledge that there will remain major disagreements and they must be realistic about Biden’s ability to prioritize the alliance over more pressing domestic matters and longer-term changes in political tides.“Divisions can always be bridged, wounds can be healed,” EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said in a speech Tuesday. “But some shifts in priorities and perceptions run much deeper than one politician or administration. And they will not disappear because of one election.”Here’s a rundown of the other main U.S.-EU disagreements on trade issues:Steel & Aluminum TariffsOne early, trust-building exercise could be a withdrawal of the Trump administration’s national security tariffs on steel and aluminum, which are viewed in Europe as a regrettable indignity.Former White House adviser Clete Willems acknowledged that the tariffs amounted to an “unforced error” by the Trump administration that’s created undue animosity between Washington and Brussels.“Of all the things Trump has done, that was the one that was unnecessary and hurt the relationship in a way that wasn’t productive at all,” Willems said in a phone interview.A move by Biden to end the steel and aluminum tariffs could encourage Brussels to withdraw its retaliatory tariffs on 2.8 billion euros ($3.3 billion) worth of iconic U.S. goods like bourbon whiskey, Harley-Davidson Inc. motorcycles and Levi Strauss & Co. jeans.Industrial Subsidies AccordThe Biden administration could work with the EU, Japan and other like-minded parties to craft new global rules to curb China’s market-distorting government aid.“I believe a Biden Administration will look to confront China and to reassert American leadership,” said Tim Brightbill, a partner at Wiley, a law firm in Washington.The Biden administration could pick up a tentative agreement that the U.S., EU, and Japan advanced in January to target Beijing’s subsidy practices that have been a source of growing trade tensions between Beijing and the rest of the world.If adopted and expanded among a large enough group of nations, the agreement could represent the most significant upgrade of the global trade rulebook in more than a decade.Digital Services TaxAnother key point of friction will continue to be the fight over Europe’s plans to impose digital services taxes, which act as levies on local sales of foreign technology companies like Facebook Inc. and Google.Austria, France, Italy, Spain and the U.K. are among countries that are either adopting or considering digital services taxes to try to gain a greater slice of the $26 trillion worldwide e-commerce marketplace.But the Trump administration argues that the taxes are discriminatory against U.S. internet companies and pledged to impose tariffs of 25% on a series of French goods including makeup, soap and handbags worth about $1.3 billion.The digital tax debate will remain a “major irritant” for Biden, Willems said. “The U.S. views this as Europeans discriminating against U.S. companies to extract revenue from them and claw it back to develop their own national champions.”Climate Change AgreementBiden has also pledged to rejoin the Paris climate agreement, which would be a welcome development for European capitals and could open some opportunities for re-engagement on a stalled trade deal to cut tariffs on environmentally friendly goods.If Biden signals his intent to re-engage on the Environmental Goods Agreement, it could increase global trade in environmental products — like solar panels, water filters, electric motors and hydraulic turbines — by $119 billion a year.Over the long term, there will be a need for the U.S. and Europe to engage on Brussels’ plans for a carbon border-adjustment mechanism that would create new costs for foreign imports from countries that are less strict about reducing pollution.“The U.S. will be moving much more slowly than the EU is committed to do,” Adam Posen, president of the Peterson Institute for International Economics in Washington, said during a recent webinar hosted by Bruegel, a Brussels-based think tank. “There is going to be a trade aspect of border adjustments that we are going to have to talk about.”For more articles like this, please visit us at bloomberg.comSubscribe now to stay ahead with the most trusted business news source.©2020 Bloomberg L.P.

,

Instant Quote

Enter the Stock Symbol.

Select the Exchange.

Select the Type of Security.

Please enter your First Name.

Please enter your Last Name.

Please enter your phone number.

Please enter your Email Address.

Please enter or select the Total Number of Shares you own.

Please enter or select the Desired Loan Amount you are seeking.

Please select the Loan Purpose.

Please select if you are an Officer/Director.

High West Capital Partners, LLC may only offer certain information to persons who are “Accredited Investors” and/or “Qualified Clients” as those terms are defined under applicable Federal Securities Laws. In order to be an “Accredited Investor” and/or a “Qualified Client”, you must meet the criteria identified in ONE OR MORE of the following categories/paragraphs numbered 1-20 below.

High West Capital Partners, LLC cannot provide you with any information regarding its Loan Programs or Investment Products unless you meet one or more of the following criteria. Furthermore, Foreign nationals who may be exempt from qualifying as a U.S. Accredited Investor are still required to meet the established criteria, in accordance with High West Capital Partners, LLC’s internal lending policies. High West Capital Partners, LLC will not provide information or lend to any individual and/or entity that does not meet one or more of the following criteria:

1) Individual with Net Worth in excess of $1.0 million. A natural person (not an entity) whose net worth, or joint net worth with his or her spouse, at the time of purchase exceeds $1,000,000 USD. (In calculating net worth, you may include your equity in personal property and real estate, including your principal residence, cash, short-term investments, stock and securities. Your inclusion of equity in personal property and real estate should be based on the fair market value of such property less debt secured by such property.)

2) Individual with $200,000 individual Annual Income. A natural person (not an entity) who had individual income of more than $200,000 in each of the preceding two calendar years, and has a reasonable expectation of reaching the same income level in the current year.

3) Individual with $300,000 Joint Annual Income. A natural person (not an entity) who had joint income with his or her spouse in excess of $300,000 in each of the preceding two calendar years, and has a reasonable expectation of reaching the same income level in the current year.

4) Corporations or Partnerships. A corporation, partnership, or similar entity that has in excess of $5 million of assets and was not formed for the specific purpose of acquiring an interest in the Corporation or Partnership.

5) Revocable Trust. A trust that is revocable by its grantors and each of whose grantors is an Accredited Investor as defined in one or more of the other categories/paragraphs numbered herein.

6) Irrevocable Trust. A trust (other than an ERISA plan) that (a)is not revocable by its grantors, (b) has in excess of $5 million of assets, (c) was not formed for the specific purpose of acquiring an interest, and (d) is directed by a person who has such knowledge and experience in financial and business matters that such person is capable of evaluating the merits and risks of an investment in the Trust.

7) IRA or Similar Benefit Plan. An IRA, Keogh or similar benefit plan that covers only a single natural person who is an Accredited Investor, as defined in one or more of the other categories/paragraphs numbered herein.

8) Participant-Directed Employee Benefit Plan Account. A participant-directed employee benefit plan investing at the direction of, and for the account of, a participant who is an Accredited Investor, as that term is defined in one or more of the other categories/paragraphs numbered herein.

9) Other ERISA Plan. An employee benefit plan within the meaning of Title I of the ERISA Act other than a participant-directed plan with total assets in excess of $5 million or for which investment decisions (including the decision to purchase an interest) are made by a bank, registered investment adviser, savings and loan association, or insurance company.

10) Government Benefit Plan. A plan established and maintained by a state, municipality, or any agency of a state or municipality, for the benefit of its employees, with total assets in excess of $5 million.

11) Non-Profit Entity. An organization described in Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, with total assets in excess of $5 million (including endowment, annuity and life income funds), as shown by the organization’s most recent audited financial statements.

12) A bank, as defined in Section 3(a)(2) of the Securities Act (whether acting for its own account or in a fiduciary capacity).

13) A savings and loan association or similar institution, as defined in Section 3(a)(5)(A) of the Securities Act (whether acting for its own account or in a fiduciary capacity).

14) A broker-dealer registered under the Exchange Act.

15) An insurance company, as defined in Section 2(13) of the Securities Act.

16) A “business development company,” as defined in Section 2(a)(48) of the Investment Company Act.

17) A small business investment company licensed under Section 301 (c) or (d) of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958.

18) A “private business development company” as defined in Section 202(a)(22) of the Advisers Act.

19) Executive Officer or Director. A natural person who is an executive officer, director or general partner of the Partnership or the General Partner, and is an Accredited Investor as that term is defined in one or more of the categories/paragraphs numbered herein.

20) Entity Owned Entirely By Accredited Investors. A corporation, partnership, private investment company or similar entity each of whose equity owners is a natural person who is an Accredited Investor, as that term is defined in one or more of the categories/paragraphs numbered herein.

Please read the notice above and check the box below to continue.

Singapore

168 Robinson Road
#12-01 Capital Tower
Singapore 068912

New York

Coming Soon!

Dubai

Coming Soon!

Market Coverage