Biogen Plunges After Alzheimer’s Blow, Analysts Downgrade, , on November 9, 2020 at 12:19 pm

By
On November 9, 2020
Tags:

(Bloomberg) — Biogen Inc. shares plunged early on Monday and analysts braced for further declines after a U.S. Food and Drug Administration advisory panel harshly judged the efficacy of the company’s experimental Alzheimer’s disease therapy, dimming prospects it will be approved by the agency.The stock fell 32% as futures trading resumed on Nasdaq after shares were halted on Friday.Wall Street firms didn’t mince words over the weekend about the panel’s findings, which was that data from a single clinical trial with positive results was insufficient to show the treatment worked. Raymond James called it a “disaster,” while Baird wrote that the panelists had “skewered the company.” An approval of the treatment, called aducanumab, is now “virtually impossible,” it added.The panel’s conclusion triggered a whiplash for investors and analysts because it came just after a positive FDA report on aducanumab sparked a historic rally, with shares surging 44% to $355.63 on Nov. 4. The stock never got a chance to trade during Friday’s session because it was halted ahead of the advisory panel’s contradictory findings. Several analysts suggested that if the FDA were to approve the treatment now, the agency would suffer a devastating blow to its reputation.Already three analysts have slashed their ratings, including a BofA about-face where a downgrade comes on the heels of a Wednesday upgrade. “We now struggle how to envision a way the agency can salvage anything positive based on unequivocally negative adcomm,” Geoff Meacham said.Jefferies predicted that Biogen shares would fall to a range of $220 to $250; they closed Nov. 5 at $328.90. This was “the most opposite of a panel vs FDA positive briefing book we’ve ever seen,” Michael Yee wrote in his analysis. Approving aducanumab could damage the agency’s scientific integrity and “raise more public skepticism around [the] FDA when there’s already scrutiny over vaccines.”The FDA’s review process will continue until there is a decision in March. Stifel expects the stock to remain volatile until then.“We will continue to work with the FDA as it completes its review of our application,” Michel Vounatsos, chief executive officer at Biogen, said in a statement Friday.Here’s what analysts are saying about the panel’s findings:BofA, Geoff MeachamCut to underperform from neutral, PT to $240 from $360There are instances where regulators have approved medicines after a negative panel vote, “but we think the political fallout here would be significant—and engender major payer pushback and physician uncertainty.”Biogen will likely perform another clinical study; if the company had restarted a late-stage trial last year “significant clinical progress could have been already been made,” supporting a 2022 applicationCowen, Phil NadeauDowngraded to market perform from outperform, PT to $215 from $275The discussion and votes were “a resounding and near unanimous rebuke of aducanumab,” as well as Biogen and the FDA’s clinical reviewers.While an approval is unlikely, “it is not impossible as the FDA clinical team clearly wanted aducanumab to be on the market” and the agency is not required to follow the panel’s advice.Raymond James, Steven SeedhouseUnderperformThe panel “was a disaster for aducanumab,” one that was “completely justified” as there is “no serious scientific argument in favor of anything other than a new prospective study”Baird, Brian SkorneyUnderperform, PT $228The panelists “skewered the company,” and the prospect of approving aducanumab “in the face of such an overwhelmingly negative vote and commentary” is “virtually impossible”; doing so “would destroy the agency’s reputation”“It is abundantly clear that whatever relationship FDA Director Dr. Billy Dunn has with aducanumab, his objectivity is completely lost”Jefferies, Michael YeeBuy, PT $450This was “the most opposite of a panel vs FDA positive briefing book we’ve ever seen”The stock will get “hit hard” and could fall to a range of $220 to $250; “the ‘trade’ is to buy the huge dip coming and it probably slowly goes back up”Approving the drug in the wake of the panel “could raise more public skepticism around [the] FDA when there’s already scrutiny over vaccines,” and it is “unclear what that would mean” for the scientific integrity of the FDAStifel, Paul MatteisHold, PT $258The panel “completely confounds things,” and the “overwhelming dissent” puts the FDA in a tough positionIf the drug is approved, “there may be considerable backlash that politics are driving the agency’s decisionmaking”The FDA may take its time acting on the application, and the stock is likely to be volatile until the PDUFA action date in MarchRBC Capital Markets, Brian AbrahamsSector perform, PT to $244 from $263The stock is likely to “overshoot to downside” in the wake of the panel, as a key driver of potential near-term value “is likely gone” and as “risks to existing products, rest of pipeline, and BD urgency, become more exposed”Bloomberg Intelligence, Marc EngelsgjerdThe panel “makes it unlikely the drug will be commercially successful,” because if the FDA approves aducanumab “after this clear vote of no confidence, it stands to lose significant credibility”Click here for the research(Updates to add shire price after trading resumed in second paragraph)For more articles like this, please visit us at bloomberg.comSubscribe now to stay ahead with the most trusted business news source.©2020 Bloomberg L.P.,

Biogen Plunges After Alzheimer’s Blow, Analysts Downgrade(Bloomberg) — Biogen Inc. shares plunged early on Monday and analysts braced for further declines after a U.S. Food and Drug Administration advisory panel harshly judged the efficacy of the company’s experimental Alzheimer’s disease therapy, dimming prospects it will be approved by the agency.The stock fell 32% as futures trading resumed on Nasdaq after shares were halted on Friday.Wall Street firms didn’t mince words over the weekend about the panel’s findings, which was that data from a single clinical trial with positive results was insufficient to show the treatment worked. Raymond James called it a “disaster,” while Baird wrote that the panelists had “skewered the company.” An approval of the treatment, called aducanumab, is now “virtually impossible,” it added.The panel’s conclusion triggered a whiplash for investors and analysts because it came just after a positive FDA report on aducanumab sparked a historic rally, with shares surging 44% to $355.63 on Nov. 4. The stock never got a chance to trade during Friday’s session because it was halted ahead of the advisory panel’s contradictory findings. Several analysts suggested that if the FDA were to approve the treatment now, the agency would suffer a devastating blow to its reputation.Already three analysts have slashed their ratings, including a BofA about-face where a downgrade comes on the heels of a Wednesday upgrade. “We now struggle how to envision a way the agency can salvage anything positive based on unequivocally negative adcomm,” Geoff Meacham said.Jefferies predicted that Biogen shares would fall to a range of $220 to $250; they closed Nov. 5 at $328.90. This was “the most opposite of a panel vs FDA positive briefing book we’ve ever seen,” Michael Yee wrote in his analysis. Approving aducanumab could damage the agency’s scientific integrity and “raise more public skepticism around [the] FDA when there’s already scrutiny over vaccines.”The FDA’s review process will continue until there is a decision in March. Stifel expects the stock to remain volatile until then.“We will continue to work with the FDA as it completes its review of our application,” Michel Vounatsos, chief executive officer at Biogen, said in a statement Friday.Here’s what analysts are saying about the panel’s findings:BofA, Geoff MeachamCut to underperform from neutral, PT to $240 from $360There are instances where regulators have approved medicines after a negative panel vote, “but we think the political fallout here would be significant—and engender major payer pushback and physician uncertainty.”Biogen will likely perform another clinical study; if the company had restarted a late-stage trial last year “significant clinical progress could have been already been made,” supporting a 2022 applicationCowen, Phil NadeauDowngraded to market perform from outperform, PT to $215 from $275The discussion and votes were “a resounding and near unanimous rebuke of aducanumab,” as well as Biogen and the FDA’s clinical reviewers.While an approval is unlikely, “it is not impossible as the FDA clinical team clearly wanted aducanumab to be on the market” and the agency is not required to follow the panel’s advice.Raymond James, Steven SeedhouseUnderperformThe panel “was a disaster for aducanumab,” one that was “completely justified” as there is “no serious scientific argument in favor of anything other than a new prospective study”Baird, Brian SkorneyUnderperform, PT $228The panelists “skewered the company,” and the prospect of approving aducanumab “in the face of such an overwhelmingly negative vote and commentary” is “virtually impossible”; doing so “would destroy the agency’s reputation”“It is abundantly clear that whatever relationship FDA Director Dr. Billy Dunn has with aducanumab, his objectivity is completely lost”Jefferies, Michael YeeBuy, PT $450This was “the most opposite of a panel vs FDA positive briefing book we’ve ever seen”The stock will get “hit hard” and could fall to a range of $220 to $250; “the ‘trade’ is to buy the huge dip coming and it probably slowly goes back up”Approving the drug in the wake of the panel “could raise more public skepticism around [the] FDA when there’s already scrutiny over vaccines,” and it is “unclear what that would mean” for the scientific integrity of the FDAStifel, Paul MatteisHold, PT $258The panel “completely confounds things,” and the “overwhelming dissent” puts the FDA in a tough positionIf the drug is approved, “there may be considerable backlash that politics are driving the agency’s decisionmaking”The FDA may take its time acting on the application, and the stock is likely to be volatile until the PDUFA action date in MarchRBC Capital Markets, Brian AbrahamsSector perform, PT to $244 from $263The stock is likely to “overshoot to downside” in the wake of the panel, as a key driver of potential near-term value “is likely gone” and as “risks to existing products, rest of pipeline, and BD urgency, become more exposed”Bloomberg Intelligence, Marc EngelsgjerdThe panel “makes it unlikely the drug will be commercially successful,” because if the FDA approves aducanumab “after this clear vote of no confidence, it stands to lose significant credibility”Click here for the research(Updates to add shire price after trading resumed in second paragraph)For more articles like this, please visit us at bloomberg.comSubscribe now to stay ahead with the most trusted business news source.©2020 Bloomberg L.P.

,

Instant Quote

Enter the Stock Symbol.

Select the Exchange.

Select the Type of Security.

Please enter your First Name.

Please enter your Last Name.

Please enter your phone number.

Please enter your Email Address.

Please enter or select the Total Number of Shares you own.

Please enter or select the Desired Loan Amount you are seeking.

Please select the Loan Purpose.

Please select if you are an Officer/Director.

High West Capital Partners, LLC may only offer certain information to persons who are “Accredited Investors” and/or “Qualified Clients” as those terms are defined under applicable Federal Securities Laws. In order to be an “Accredited Investor” and/or a “Qualified Client”, you must meet the criteria identified in ONE OR MORE of the following categories/paragraphs numbered 1-20 below.

High West Capital Partners, LLC cannot provide you with any information regarding its Loan Programs or Investment Products unless you meet one or more of the following criteria. Furthermore, Foreign nationals who may be exempt from qualifying as a U.S. Accredited Investor are still required to meet the established criteria, in accordance with High West Capital Partners, LLC’s internal lending policies. High West Capital Partners, LLC will not provide information or lend to any individual and/or entity that does not meet one or more of the following criteria:

1) Individual with Net Worth in excess of $1.0 million. A natural person (not an entity) whose net worth, or joint net worth with his or her spouse, at the time of purchase exceeds $1,000,000 USD. (In calculating net worth, you may include your equity in personal property and real estate, including your principal residence, cash, short-term investments, stock and securities. Your inclusion of equity in personal property and real estate should be based on the fair market value of such property less debt secured by such property.)

2) Individual with $200,000 individual Annual Income. A natural person (not an entity) who had individual income of more than $200,000 in each of the preceding two calendar years, and has a reasonable expectation of reaching the same income level in the current year.

3) Individual with $300,000 Joint Annual Income. A natural person (not an entity) who had joint income with his or her spouse in excess of $300,000 in each of the preceding two calendar years, and has a reasonable expectation of reaching the same income level in the current year.

4) Corporations or Partnerships. A corporation, partnership, or similar entity that has in excess of $5 million of assets and was not formed for the specific purpose of acquiring an interest in the Corporation or Partnership.

5) Revocable Trust. A trust that is revocable by its grantors and each of whose grantors is an Accredited Investor as defined in one or more of the other categories/paragraphs numbered herein.

6) Irrevocable Trust. A trust (other than an ERISA plan) that (a)is not revocable by its grantors, (b) has in excess of $5 million of assets, (c) was not formed for the specific purpose of acquiring an interest, and (d) is directed by a person who has such knowledge and experience in financial and business matters that such person is capable of evaluating the merits and risks of an investment in the Trust.

7) IRA or Similar Benefit Plan. An IRA, Keogh or similar benefit plan that covers only a single natural person who is an Accredited Investor, as defined in one or more of the other categories/paragraphs numbered herein.

8) Participant-Directed Employee Benefit Plan Account. A participant-directed employee benefit plan investing at the direction of, and for the account of, a participant who is an Accredited Investor, as that term is defined in one or more of the other categories/paragraphs numbered herein.

9) Other ERISA Plan. An employee benefit plan within the meaning of Title I of the ERISA Act other than a participant-directed plan with total assets in excess of $5 million or for which investment decisions (including the decision to purchase an interest) are made by a bank, registered investment adviser, savings and loan association, or insurance company.

10) Government Benefit Plan. A plan established and maintained by a state, municipality, or any agency of a state or municipality, for the benefit of its employees, with total assets in excess of $5 million.

11) Non-Profit Entity. An organization described in Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, with total assets in excess of $5 million (including endowment, annuity and life income funds), as shown by the organization’s most recent audited financial statements.

12) A bank, as defined in Section 3(a)(2) of the Securities Act (whether acting for its own account or in a fiduciary capacity).

13) A savings and loan association or similar institution, as defined in Section 3(a)(5)(A) of the Securities Act (whether acting for its own account or in a fiduciary capacity).

14) A broker-dealer registered under the Exchange Act.

15) An insurance company, as defined in Section 2(13) of the Securities Act.

16) A “business development company,” as defined in Section 2(a)(48) of the Investment Company Act.

17) A small business investment company licensed under Section 301 (c) or (d) of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958.

18) A “private business development company” as defined in Section 202(a)(22) of the Advisers Act.

19) Executive Officer or Director. A natural person who is an executive officer, director or general partner of the Partnership or the General Partner, and is an Accredited Investor as that term is defined in one or more of the categories/paragraphs numbered herein.

20) Entity Owned Entirely By Accredited Investors. A corporation, partnership, private investment company or similar entity each of whose equity owners is a natural person who is an Accredited Investor, as that term is defined in one or more of the categories/paragraphs numbered herein.

Please read the notice above and check the box below to continue.

Singapore

+65 3105 1295

Taiwan

Coming Soon!

Hong Kong

R91, 3rd Floor,
Eton Tower, 8 Hysan Ave.
Causeway Bay, Hong Kong
+852 3002 4462

Market Coverage