EU Seeks Brexit Bargaining Chip, Pitting Fishing Rights Against Energy Access, , on November 12, 2020 at 5:00 am

By
On November 12, 2020
Tags:

(Bloomberg) — Brexit talks are going down to the wire, and the European Union’s chief negotiator Michel Barnier is threatening British access to the continent’s single energy market as a way of extracting concessions on fishing rights.At stake is at least 6 billion euros ($7.1 billion) of natural gas and electricity traded across the English channel every year, according to research by Bruegel, an economics research group in Brussels. That benefits companies from Centrica Plc and National Grid Plc in the U.K. to Electricite de France SA and RWE AG on the continent.In negotiations, Barnier is conditioning the U.K.’s access to the EU energy market to the EU’s rights to fish in British waters. Envoys are working on a deal that will apply after the U.K. leaves the EU’s single market at the end of the year.The impact of failing to reach a deal that includes energy would “disproportionately fall on the U.K. as the continental market is much larger and already better integrated,” said Simone Tagliapietra, research fellow at Bruegel.What’s the biggest vulnerability?Electricity is a particular pinch-point. Britain is a net importer with wholesale prices higher than its neighbors. About 7% of total demand comes from power sent along five huge cables, four of which are connected to Europe. Last year, net imports grew 10% to a record 21.4 terawatt-hours, according to data from Enappsys Ltd.What happens if an agreement is reached?The negotiating position outlined by the EU is very close to the way things are now. If that’s agreed, both sides would continue to trade gas and power more or less the way they do now. There could be some divergence in the future as new rules are made on either side, but both would be starting from the same point.And if there’s no Brexit deal?The markets would operate less efficiently than they do now, according to Alex Harrison an energy partner at Hogan Lovells International LLP. The U.K. would need to replace rules that regulate how electricity and gas flow through pipeline and cable links between each region.New regulations would likely be a version of what we have now, but trade might not be as efficient. For example, auctions for capacity on interconnectors between Britain and EU nations, is currently integrated with European electricity markets to ensure power supply flows to where prices are more expensive. Without that provision, interconnector capacity would be auctioned separately, and flows might not follow prices.Without a deal, costs for British consumers could go up by 2 billion pounds ($2.6 billion) a year as the U.K. misses out on the benefits of an integrated market, a report by the UCL European Institute shows.What is the worst-case scenario?If relations between Britain and the EU broke down completely and actions became punitive, then power and gas could stop flowing. This would have serious implications for Britain’s security of supply. The U.K. would lose 7% of its electricity supply and would struggle to find an easy replacement. It could even lead to rolling blackouts at times of peak demand.Gas accounts for about 80% of the value of the energy trade between the U.K. and EU, with producing fields in the British part of the North Sea feeding into the continental grid. There are three gas interconnectors between the U.K. and Belgium, the Netherlands and Ireland.These deliveries have become more important in recent years with the closure of the Rough gas storage facility, a substantial site that allowed for flows produced in the summer to be set aside for winter when they’re most needed. Now, Britain mainly relies on the rest of Europe to supply that gas-grid balancing service.Are there other impacts?Shutting Britain out of the European gas market would have consequences for Ireland, which imports 56% of its consumption from the U.K. The creation of the Single Electricity Market in Ireland links the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland and could be entirely disrupted.What does the government say?The government gives some guidance for electricity trading from Jan. 1 on its website:Cross-border flows across electricity interconnectors will no longer be governed by EU legislation. Depending on the outcome of Free Trade Agreement negotiations, alternative trading arrangements will need to be developed.Interconnector owners/operators will need to continue to work with their stakeholders and regulators to prepare alternative trading arrangements and updated rules.The U.K. will continue to work as normal with regulators, and Transmissions System Operators to ensure existing measures are in place to deliver continuity of supply in all scenarios.Depending on the outcome of FTA negotiations, trade on interconnectors may be less efficient.For more articles like this, please visit us at bloomberg.comSubscribe now to stay ahead with the most trusted business news source.©2020 Bloomberg L.P.,

EU Seeks Brexit Bargaining Chip, Pitting Fishing Rights Against Energy Access(Bloomberg) — Brexit talks are going down to the wire, and the European Union’s chief negotiator Michel Barnier is threatening British access to the continent’s single energy market as a way of extracting concessions on fishing rights.At stake is at least 6 billion euros ($7.1 billion) of natural gas and electricity traded across the English channel every year, according to research by Bruegel, an economics research group in Brussels. That benefits companies from Centrica Plc and National Grid Plc in the U.K. to Electricite de France SA and RWE AG on the continent.In negotiations, Barnier is conditioning the U.K.’s access to the EU energy market to the EU’s rights to fish in British waters. Envoys are working on a deal that will apply after the U.K. leaves the EU’s single market at the end of the year.The impact of failing to reach a deal that includes energy would “disproportionately fall on the U.K. as the continental market is much larger and already better integrated,” said Simone Tagliapietra, research fellow at Bruegel.What’s the biggest vulnerability?Electricity is a particular pinch-point. Britain is a net importer with wholesale prices higher than its neighbors. About 7% of total demand comes from power sent along five huge cables, four of which are connected to Europe. Last year, net imports grew 10% to a record 21.4 terawatt-hours, according to data from Enappsys Ltd.What happens if an agreement is reached?The negotiating position outlined by the EU is very close to the way things are now. If that’s agreed, both sides would continue to trade gas and power more or less the way they do now. There could be some divergence in the future as new rules are made on either side, but both would be starting from the same point.And if there’s no Brexit deal?The markets would operate less efficiently than they do now, according to Alex Harrison an energy partner at Hogan Lovells International LLP. The U.K. would need to replace rules that regulate how electricity and gas flow through pipeline and cable links between each region.New regulations would likely be a version of what we have now, but trade might not be as efficient. For example, auctions for capacity on interconnectors between Britain and EU nations, is currently integrated with European electricity markets to ensure power supply flows to where prices are more expensive. Without that provision, interconnector capacity would be auctioned separately, and flows might not follow prices.Without a deal, costs for British consumers could go up by 2 billion pounds ($2.6 billion) a year as the U.K. misses out on the benefits of an integrated market, a report by the UCL European Institute shows.What is the worst-case scenario?If relations between Britain and the EU broke down completely and actions became punitive, then power and gas could stop flowing. This would have serious implications for Britain’s security of supply. The U.K. would lose 7% of its electricity supply and would struggle to find an easy replacement. It could even lead to rolling blackouts at times of peak demand.Gas accounts for about 80% of the value of the energy trade between the U.K. and EU, with producing fields in the British part of the North Sea feeding into the continental grid. There are three gas interconnectors between the U.K. and Belgium, the Netherlands and Ireland.These deliveries have become more important in recent years with the closure of the Rough gas storage facility, a substantial site that allowed for flows produced in the summer to be set aside for winter when they’re most needed. Now, Britain mainly relies on the rest of Europe to supply that gas-grid balancing service.Are there other impacts?Shutting Britain out of the European gas market would have consequences for Ireland, which imports 56% of its consumption from the U.K. The creation of the Single Electricity Market in Ireland links the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland and could be entirely disrupted.What does the government say?The government gives some guidance for electricity trading from Jan. 1 on its website:Cross-border flows across electricity interconnectors will no longer be governed by EU legislation. Depending on the outcome of Free Trade Agreement negotiations, alternative trading arrangements will need to be developed.Interconnector owners/operators will need to continue to work with their stakeholders and regulators to prepare alternative trading arrangements and updated rules.The U.K. will continue to work as normal with regulators, and Transmissions System Operators to ensure existing measures are in place to deliver continuity of supply in all scenarios.Depending on the outcome of FTA negotiations, trade on interconnectors may be less efficient.For more articles like this, please visit us at bloomberg.comSubscribe now to stay ahead with the most trusted business news source.©2020 Bloomberg L.P.

,

Instant Quote

Enter the Stock Symbol.

Select the Exchange.

Select the Type of Security.

Please enter your First Name.

Please enter your Last Name.

Please enter your phone number.

Please enter your Email Address.

Please enter or select the Total Number of Shares you own.

Please enter or select the Desired Loan Amount you are seeking.

Please select the Loan Purpose.

Please select if you are an Officer/Director.

High West Capital Partners, LLC may only offer certain information to persons who are “Accredited Investors” and/or “Qualified Clients” as those terms are defined under applicable Federal Securities Laws. In order to be an “Accredited Investor” and/or a “Qualified Client”, you must meet the criteria identified in ONE OR MORE of the following categories/paragraphs numbered 1-20 below.

High West Capital Partners, LLC cannot provide you with any information regarding its Loan Programs or Investment Products unless you meet one or more of the following criteria. Furthermore, Foreign nationals who may be exempt from qualifying as a U.S. Accredited Investor are still required to meet the established criteria, in accordance with High West Capital Partners, LLC’s internal lending policies. High West Capital Partners, LLC will not provide information or lend to any individual and/or entity that does not meet one or more of the following criteria:

1) Individual with Net Worth in excess of $1.0 million. A natural person (not an entity) whose net worth, or joint net worth with his or her spouse, at the time of purchase exceeds $1,000,000 USD. (In calculating net worth, you may include your equity in personal property and real estate, including your principal residence, cash, short-term investments, stock and securities. Your inclusion of equity in personal property and real estate should be based on the fair market value of such property less debt secured by such property.)

2) Individual with $200,000 individual Annual Income. A natural person (not an entity) who had individual income of more than $200,000 in each of the preceding two calendar years, and has a reasonable expectation of reaching the same income level in the current year.

3) Individual with $300,000 Joint Annual Income. A natural person (not an entity) who had joint income with his or her spouse in excess of $300,000 in each of the preceding two calendar years, and has a reasonable expectation of reaching the same income level in the current year.

4) Corporations or Partnerships. A corporation, partnership, or similar entity that has in excess of $5 million of assets and was not formed for the specific purpose of acquiring an interest in the Corporation or Partnership.

5) Revocable Trust. A trust that is revocable by its grantors and each of whose grantors is an Accredited Investor as defined in one or more of the other categories/paragraphs numbered herein.

6) Irrevocable Trust. A trust (other than an ERISA plan) that (a)is not revocable by its grantors, (b) has in excess of $5 million of assets, (c) was not formed for the specific purpose of acquiring an interest, and (d) is directed by a person who has such knowledge and experience in financial and business matters that such person is capable of evaluating the merits and risks of an investment in the Trust.

7) IRA or Similar Benefit Plan. An IRA, Keogh or similar benefit plan that covers only a single natural person who is an Accredited Investor, as defined in one or more of the other categories/paragraphs numbered herein.

8) Participant-Directed Employee Benefit Plan Account. A participant-directed employee benefit plan investing at the direction of, and for the account of, a participant who is an Accredited Investor, as that term is defined in one or more of the other categories/paragraphs numbered herein.

9) Other ERISA Plan. An employee benefit plan within the meaning of Title I of the ERISA Act other than a participant-directed plan with total assets in excess of $5 million or for which investment decisions (including the decision to purchase an interest) are made by a bank, registered investment adviser, savings and loan association, or insurance company.

10) Government Benefit Plan. A plan established and maintained by a state, municipality, or any agency of a state or municipality, for the benefit of its employees, with total assets in excess of $5 million.

11) Non-Profit Entity. An organization described in Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, with total assets in excess of $5 million (including endowment, annuity and life income funds), as shown by the organization’s most recent audited financial statements.

12) A bank, as defined in Section 3(a)(2) of the Securities Act (whether acting for its own account or in a fiduciary capacity).

13) A savings and loan association or similar institution, as defined in Section 3(a)(5)(A) of the Securities Act (whether acting for its own account or in a fiduciary capacity).

14) A broker-dealer registered under the Exchange Act.

15) An insurance company, as defined in Section 2(13) of the Securities Act.

16) A “business development company,” as defined in Section 2(a)(48) of the Investment Company Act.

17) A small business investment company licensed under Section 301 (c) or (d) of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958.

18) A “private business development company” as defined in Section 202(a)(22) of the Advisers Act.

19) Executive Officer or Director. A natural person who is an executive officer, director or general partner of the Partnership or the General Partner, and is an Accredited Investor as that term is defined in one or more of the categories/paragraphs numbered herein.

20) Entity Owned Entirely By Accredited Investors. A corporation, partnership, private investment company or similar entity each of whose equity owners is a natural person who is an Accredited Investor, as that term is defined in one or more of the categories/paragraphs numbered herein.

Please read the notice above and check the box below to continue.

Singapore

168 Robinson Road
#12-01 Capital Tower
Singapore 068912

New York

Coming Soon!

Dubai

Coming Soon!

Market Coverage