News Analysis: Evidence Mounts That Nikola Badger Is Roadkill, , on October 1, 2020 at 7:05 pm

Financial News
By
On October 1, 2020
In Financial News
Tags:

The much-hyped Nikola Badger electric pickup looks like an endangered species. It is absent from the electric truck startup’s road map of milestones, and a delayed manufacturing deal with General Motors Company (NYSE: GM) points to its demise before a physical prototype is ever revealed.The Badger was not in Nikola Corp. (NASDAQ: NKLA) business plan a year ago. And it isn’t there now. Founder Trevor Milton used it as a buzz-building tool for the company following the reveal of rival Tesla Inc. (NASDAQ: TSLA) Cybertruck, a polarizing design that the electric truck leader plans to build at a new plant in Austin, Texas.”A lot of people didn’t like the look of the Cybertruck, including me,” Nikola CEO Mark Russell said on the company’s earnings call on Aug. 4. “I think it looks like a doorstop. But they got lots of reservations for it. So Trevor just released the concept that we had for the pickup truck.”Nikola put the Badger image on the company website where 89,000 people expressed interest. “That’s when we got serious about it and said, ‘I think the world wants us to build this darn thing,’ but it wasn’t in the plan before,” Russell said. “So we said, ‘Hey, if we’re going to do it, we’re going to need a partner.”Mum’s the word Nikola began taking Badger deposits of up to $5,000 on June 29. It promised the truck, priced between $60,000 and $90,000, would be revealed at NikolaWorld 2020 in December in Phoenix. Citing Arizona rules against large gatherings during the pandemic, Nikola indefinitely postponed the event on Wednesday.A spokeswoman declined Thursday to say how many deposits the company received for the Badger or how much money was collected.In an interview with FreightWaves on Wednesday, Russell declined to answer when asked whether Milton’s association with the Badger hurt its prospects. He said only that the Badger was part of the ongoing GM discussions he could not characterize.The competition for electric pickup trucks is huge. In addition to the Cybertruck, established automakers GM and Ford Motor Company (NYSE: F) and startups Rivian and Lordstown Motors plan entries. Nikola does not have a distribution or sales network for the Badger, which would remain a Nikola product even with GM as its contract manufacturer. It also needs money to pay GM for each truck. That is $700 million based on 50,000 trucks, according to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filing on the GM-Nikola deal. All of Nikola’s current cash is dedicated to construction of its $600 million assembly plant in Coolidge, Arizona.”As we execute on the roadmap we’ve laid out, that should allow us to go back to the market and get additional capital,” Russell told FreightWaves on Wednesday.The GM negotiations People close to the situation told FreightWaves that Milton was “hell bent” on getting a manufacturing partner for the Badger. It became part of negotiations with GM about supplying batteries and fuel cells for Nikola’s Class 7-8 heavy-duty trucks in North America.When Nikola and GM announced a deal Sept. 8 under which GM would get an 11% ownership in Nikola in exchange for using GM’s battery-elect truck platform, the two sides said they expected the deal to close before Wednesday.Those talks are continuing after Nikola’s stock cratered following a short seller’s report Sept. 10 that alleged years of fraud and misrepresentations by Milton. Ten days later, Milton resigned as executive chairman and left the company.The $2 billion GM was to receive was based on nearly 48 million new shares priced at $41.93. Nikola shares fell into the mid-teens last week. They are recovering since the company issued a lengthy press release Wednesday laying out milestones the company plans to achieve through 2023. Nikola has about 400 million outstanding shares. Diluting existing shareholders by issuing new shares is a trap that electric delivery van maker Workhorse Group (NASDAQ: WKHS) found itself in after listing on the NASDAQ. Still Workhorse shares are rading near its record high as it is finally producing vans.Will GM get more of Nikola or walk away? Even at a price of $23.81 at 2 p.m. EDT on Thursday, the value of the deal for GM is well below the agreement. Either side can walk away if it does not close by Dec. 3. It is possible that GM could seek more shares and a larger stake in Nikola, though the original deal accounts for share price movement.GM has no cash in the Nikola deal, so it has little downside. It negotiated to get 80% of zero  emission vehicle (ZEV) credits that Badger sales generate. Those credits help offset pollution penalties generated by GM’s large trucks and SUVs.”This arrangement initially seemed like a pretty good deal for both parties,” said Mike Ramsey, a Gartner Inc. vice president who follows autos and mobility. “But as it has become more complicated with recent revelations, GM is more likely to seek more ironclad certainty that they will not be embarrassed or have some other unexpected downside going forward.”Batteries and fuel cells The other part of the Nikola-GM deal — supplying batteries and fuel cells to Nikola’s heavy-duty trucks — got less attention. But it might mean more to GM as it provides entry into the heavy-duty trucking space where the company does not compete.”I think the fuel cell stuff is probably the bigger incremental value to GM,”  Sam Abuelsamid, principal analyst at Guidehouse Insights, told FreightWaves. “This is their first real customer for them. So I think that’s clearly got to be the priority.”GM would be happy to soak up assembly capacity with the Badger and capture the ZEV credits, he said. One downside for GM is that Nikola has the “cool kid” image that an old line manufacturer like GM lacks. “Even though it’s the exact same hardware, people that want to buy an electric truck might be more interested in buying from a Nikola than a GM,” Abuelsamid said. “From Mark Russell’s standpoint, it probably would be wise to drop the Badger and focus on the trucks.”Related articles: Nikola battles back: Electric truck startup seeks to calm investorsGM deal with Nikola delayed beyond anticipated closing dateNikola begins Badger electric pickup marketing pushClick for more FreightWaves articles by Alan Adler.See more from Benzinga * Options Trades For This Crazy Market: Get Benzinga Options to Follow High-Conviction Trade Ideas * GM Deal With Nikola Delayed Beyond Anticipated Close * Nikola’s Hunt For Hydrogen Station Partner Stalled – WSJ(C) 2020 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.,

News Analysis: Evidence Mounts That Nikola Badger Is RoadkillThe much-hyped Nikola Badger electric pickup looks like an endangered species. It is absent from the electric truck startup’s road map of milestones, and a delayed manufacturing deal with General Motors Company (NYSE: GM) points to its demise before a physical prototype is ever revealed.The Badger was not in Nikola Corp. (NASDAQ: NKLA) business plan a year ago. And it isn’t there now. Founder Trevor Milton used it as a buzz-building tool for the company following the reveal of rival Tesla Inc. (NASDAQ: TSLA) Cybertruck, a polarizing design that the electric truck leader plans to build at a new plant in Austin, Texas.”A lot of people didn’t like the look of the Cybertruck, including me,” Nikola CEO Mark Russell said on the company’s earnings call on Aug. 4. “I think it looks like a doorstop. But they got lots of reservations for it. So Trevor just released the concept that we had for the pickup truck.”Nikola put the Badger image on the company website where 89,000 people expressed interest. “That’s when we got serious about it and said, ‘I think the world wants us to build this darn thing,’ but it wasn’t in the plan before,” Russell said. “So we said, ‘Hey, if we’re going to do it, we’re going to need a partner.”Mum’s the word Nikola began taking Badger deposits of up to $5,000 on June 29. It promised the truck, priced between $60,000 and $90,000, would be revealed at NikolaWorld 2020 in December in Phoenix. Citing Arizona rules against large gatherings during the pandemic, Nikola indefinitely postponed the event on Wednesday.A spokeswoman declined Thursday to say how many deposits the company received for the Badger or how much money was collected.In an interview with FreightWaves on Wednesday, Russell declined to answer when asked whether Milton’s association with the Badger hurt its prospects. He said only that the Badger was part of the ongoing GM discussions he could not characterize.The competition for electric pickup trucks is huge. In addition to the Cybertruck, established automakers GM and Ford Motor Company (NYSE: F) and startups Rivian and Lordstown Motors plan entries. Nikola does not have a distribution or sales network for the Badger, which would remain a Nikola product even with GM as its contract manufacturer. It also needs money to pay GM for each truck. That is $700 million based on 50,000 trucks, according to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filing on the GM-Nikola deal. All of Nikola’s current cash is dedicated to construction of its $600 million assembly plant in Coolidge, Arizona.”As we execute on the roadmap we’ve laid out, that should allow us to go back to the market and get additional capital,” Russell told FreightWaves on Wednesday.The GM negotiations People close to the situation told FreightWaves that Milton was “hell bent” on getting a manufacturing partner for the Badger. It became part of negotiations with GM about supplying batteries and fuel cells for Nikola’s Class 7-8 heavy-duty trucks in North America.When Nikola and GM announced a deal Sept. 8 under which GM would get an 11% ownership in Nikola in exchange for using GM’s battery-elect truck platform, the two sides said they expected the deal to close before Wednesday.Those talks are continuing after Nikola’s stock cratered following a short seller’s report Sept. 10 that alleged years of fraud and misrepresentations by Milton. Ten days later, Milton resigned as executive chairman and left the company.The $2 billion GM was to receive was based on nearly 48 million new shares priced at $41.93. Nikola shares fell into the mid-teens last week. They are recovering since the company issued a lengthy press release Wednesday laying out milestones the company plans to achieve through 2023. Nikola has about 400 million outstanding shares. Diluting existing shareholders by issuing new shares is a trap that electric delivery van maker Workhorse Group (NASDAQ: WKHS) found itself in after listing on the NASDAQ. Still Workhorse shares are rading near its record high as it is finally producing vans.Will GM get more of Nikola or walk away? Even at a price of $23.81 at 2 p.m. EDT on Thursday, the value of the deal for GM is well below the agreement. Either side can walk away if it does not close by Dec. 3. It is possible that GM could seek more shares and a larger stake in Nikola, though the original deal accounts for share price movement.GM has no cash in the Nikola deal, so it has little downside. It negotiated to get 80% of zero  emission vehicle (ZEV) credits that Badger sales generate. Those credits help offset pollution penalties generated by GM’s large trucks and SUVs.”This arrangement initially seemed like a pretty good deal for both parties,” said Mike Ramsey, a Gartner Inc. vice president who follows autos and mobility. “But as it has become more complicated with recent revelations, GM is more likely to seek more ironclad certainty that they will not be embarrassed or have some other unexpected downside going forward.”Batteries and fuel cells The other part of the Nikola-GM deal — supplying batteries and fuel cells to Nikola’s heavy-duty trucks — got less attention. But it might mean more to GM as it provides entry into the heavy-duty trucking space where the company does not compete.”I think the fuel cell stuff is probably the bigger incremental value to GM,”  Sam Abuelsamid, principal analyst at Guidehouse Insights, told FreightWaves. “This is their first real customer for them. So I think that’s clearly got to be the priority.”GM would be happy to soak up assembly capacity with the Badger and capture the ZEV credits, he said. One downside for GM is that Nikola has the “cool kid” image that an old line manufacturer like GM lacks. “Even though it’s the exact same hardware, people that want to buy an electric truck might be more interested in buying from a Nikola than a GM,” Abuelsamid said. “From Mark Russell’s standpoint, it probably would be wise to drop the Badger and focus on the trucks.”Related articles: Nikola battles back: Electric truck startup seeks to calm investorsGM deal with Nikola delayed beyond anticipated closing dateNikola begins Badger electric pickup marketing pushClick for more FreightWaves articles by Alan Adler.See more from Benzinga * Options Trades For This Crazy Market: Get Benzinga Options to Follow High-Conviction Trade Ideas * GM Deal With Nikola Delayed Beyond Anticipated Close * Nikola’s Hunt For Hydrogen Station Partner Stalled – WSJ(C) 2020 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

,

Instant Quote

Enter the Stock Symbol.

Select the Exchange.

Select the Type of Security.

Please enter your First Name.

Please enter your Last Name.

Please enter your phone number.

Please enter your Email Address.

Please enter or select the Total Number of Shares you own.

Please enter or select the Desired Loan Amount you are seeking.

Please select the Loan Purpose.

Please select if you are an Officer/Director.

High West Capital Partners, LLC may only offer certain information to persons who are “Accredited Investors” and/or “Qualified Clients” as those terms are defined under applicable Federal Securities Laws. In order to be an “Accredited Investor” and/or a “Qualified Client”, you must meet the criteria identified in ONE OR MORE of the following categories/paragraphs numbered 1-20 below.

High West Capital Partners, LLC cannot provide you with any information regarding its Loan Programs or Investment Products unless you meet one or more of the following criteria. Furthermore, Foreign nationals who may be exempt from qualifying as a U.S. Accredited Investor are still required to meet the established criteria, in accordance with High West Capital Partners, LLC’s internal lending policies. High West Capital Partners, LLC will not provide information or lend to any individual and/or entity that does not meet one or more of the following criteria:

1) Individual with Net Worth in excess of $1.0 million. A natural person (not an entity) whose net worth, or joint net worth with his or her spouse, at the time of purchase exceeds $1,000,000 USD. (In calculating net worth, you may include your equity in personal property and real estate, including your principal residence, cash, short-term investments, stock and securities. Your inclusion of equity in personal property and real estate should be based on the fair market value of such property less debt secured by such property.)

2) Individual with $200,000 individual Annual Income. A natural person (not an entity) who had individual income of more than $200,000 in each of the preceding two calendar years, and has a reasonable expectation of reaching the same income level in the current year.

3) Individual with $300,000 Joint Annual Income. A natural person (not an entity) who had joint income with his or her spouse in excess of $300,000 in each of the preceding two calendar years, and has a reasonable expectation of reaching the same income level in the current year.

4) Corporations or Partnerships. A corporation, partnership, or similar entity that has in excess of $5 million of assets and was not formed for the specific purpose of acquiring an interest in the Corporation or Partnership.

5) Revocable Trust. A trust that is revocable by its grantors and each of whose grantors is an Accredited Investor as defined in one or more of the other categories/paragraphs numbered herein.

6) Irrevocable Trust. A trust (other than an ERISA plan) that (a)is not revocable by its grantors, (b) has in excess of $5 million of assets, (c) was not formed for the specific purpose of acquiring an interest, and (d) is directed by a person who has such knowledge and experience in financial and business matters that such person is capable of evaluating the merits and risks of an investment in the Trust.

7) IRA or Similar Benefit Plan. An IRA, Keogh or similar benefit plan that covers only a single natural person who is an Accredited Investor, as defined in one or more of the other categories/paragraphs numbered herein.

8) Participant-Directed Employee Benefit Plan Account. A participant-directed employee benefit plan investing at the direction of, and for the account of, a participant who is an Accredited Investor, as that term is defined in one or more of the other categories/paragraphs numbered herein.

9) Other ERISA Plan. An employee benefit plan within the meaning of Title I of the ERISA Act other than a participant-directed plan with total assets in excess of $5 million or for which investment decisions (including the decision to purchase an interest) are made by a bank, registered investment adviser, savings and loan association, or insurance company.

10) Government Benefit Plan. A plan established and maintained by a state, municipality, or any agency of a state or municipality, for the benefit of its employees, with total assets in excess of $5 million.

11) Non-Profit Entity. An organization described in Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, with total assets in excess of $5 million (including endowment, annuity and life income funds), as shown by the organization’s most recent audited financial statements.

12) A bank, as defined in Section 3(a)(2) of the Securities Act (whether acting for its own account or in a fiduciary capacity).

13) A savings and loan association or similar institution, as defined in Section 3(a)(5)(A) of the Securities Act (whether acting for its own account or in a fiduciary capacity).

14) A broker-dealer registered under the Exchange Act.

15) An insurance company, as defined in Section 2(13) of the Securities Act.

16) A “business development company,” as defined in Section 2(a)(48) of the Investment Company Act.

17) A small business investment company licensed under Section 301 (c) or (d) of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958.

18) A “private business development company” as defined in Section 202(a)(22) of the Advisers Act.

19) Executive Officer or Director. A natural person who is an executive officer, director or general partner of the Partnership or the General Partner, and is an Accredited Investor as that term is defined in one or more of the categories/paragraphs numbered herein.

20) Entity Owned Entirely By Accredited Investors. A corporation, partnership, private investment company or similar entity each of whose equity owners is a natural person who is an Accredited Investor, as that term is defined in one or more of the categories/paragraphs numbered herein.

Please read the notice above and check the box below to continue.

Singapore

+65 3105 1295

Taiwan

Coming Soon!

Hong Kong

R91, 3rd Floor,
Eton Tower, 8 Hysan Ave.
Causeway Bay, Hong Kong
+852 3002 4462

Follow Us

Market Coverage