Prosus Has a $5 Billion Solution to a $59 Billion Problem, , on October 30, 2020 at 1:40 pm

Financial News
By
On October 30, 2020
In Financial News
Tags:

(Bloomberg Opinion) — Prosus NV, which became Europe’s largest technology company this week, has always been something of a Gordian knot for investors.The Amsterdam-based company derives the entirety of its 141 billion-euro ($165 billion) market capitalization from its 31% stake in Tencent Holdings Ltd., the Chinese e-commerce giant. Indeed, it trades at a $59 billion discount to the value of that holding, meaning that investors essentially ascribe a negative value to its other investments, such as Russia’s Mail.Ru Group Ltd. and Brazilian food delivery platform iFood.Tencent stock has soared 57% increase this year, easily making it the best performer in the firm’s portfolio. This begs the question: Why would Prosus Chief Executive Officer Bob van Dijk put the company’s money in anything else? It’s hard to find other investments that can deliver similar returns. But equally, why invest in Prosus shares to get exposure to Tencent when you could just invest directly in Tencent itself? That’s the Gordian knot which van Dijk has the unenviable task of trying to unravel.On Friday, van Dijk seemed to tacitly admit the struggle to find other investments that could rival Tencent in terms of value creation by announcing plans to buy back as much as $5 billion shares in itself and Naspers Ltd., the South African parent company from which Prosus was spun out last year. It’s a sensible use of the company’s $8.7 billion cash pile, most of which derives from the sale of some of its Tencent stake two years ago.Van Dijk learned the hard way that shareholders are skittish about how Prosus uses its funds for new dealmaking. The spin-out from Naspers was intended to reduce the discount at which the company traded to its Tencent stake. In the days immediately after the Amsterdam listing in September 2019, the ploy proved successful, as Prosus traded closer to the value of its holding in the Chinese firm.But just weeks after the listing, Prosus made a 4.9 billion-pound ($6.4 billion) bid to acquire the British food delivery platform Just Eat Plc. The company’s shares tumbled, reopening the valuation gap to the Tencent holding. Even though Takeaway.com NV ultimately bought Just Eat, Prosus continues to trade at a discount to the value of its assets. The Dutch firm still became Europe’s largest tech company by market capitalization this week after SAP SE shares declined following a profit warning.The buyback ought to provide some reassurance to investors that van Dijk is wary about overspending on deals, though he can always sell more Tencent stock to fund massive acquisitions when a lockup expires next year. Plus they’ll benefit from the reduced share count through greater exposure to the Chinese giant.Van Dijk isn’t so much cutting the Gordian knot as learning to live with it. And that might be what shareholders need.This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.Alex Webb is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Europe’s technology, media and communications industries. He previously covered Apple and other technology companies for Bloomberg News in San Francisco.For more articles like this, please visit us at bloomberg.com/opinionSubscribe now to stay ahead with the most trusted business news source.©2020 Bloomberg L.P.,

Prosus Has a $5 Billion Solution to a $59 Billion Problem(Bloomberg Opinion) — Prosus NV, which became Europe’s largest technology company this week, has always been something of a Gordian knot for investors.The Amsterdam-based company derives the entirety of its 141 billion-euro ($165 billion) market capitalization from its 31% stake in Tencent Holdings Ltd., the Chinese e-commerce giant. Indeed, it trades at a $59 billion discount to the value of that holding, meaning that investors essentially ascribe a negative value to its other investments, such as Russia’s Mail.Ru Group Ltd. and Brazilian food delivery platform iFood.Tencent stock has soared 57% increase this year, easily making it the best performer in the firm’s portfolio. This begs the question: Why would Prosus Chief Executive Officer Bob van Dijk put the company’s money in anything else? It’s hard to find other investments that can deliver similar returns. But equally, why invest in Prosus shares to get exposure to Tencent when you could just invest directly in Tencent itself? That’s the Gordian knot which van Dijk has the unenviable task of trying to unravel.On Friday, van Dijk seemed to tacitly admit the struggle to find other investments that could rival Tencent in terms of value creation by announcing plans to buy back as much as $5 billion shares in itself and Naspers Ltd., the South African parent company from which Prosus was spun out last year. It’s a sensible use of the company’s $8.7 billion cash pile, most of which derives from the sale of some of its Tencent stake two years ago.Van Dijk learned the hard way that shareholders are skittish about how Prosus uses its funds for new dealmaking. The spin-out from Naspers was intended to reduce the discount at which the company traded to its Tencent stake. In the days immediately after the Amsterdam listing in September 2019, the ploy proved successful, as Prosus traded closer to the value of its holding in the Chinese firm.But just weeks after the listing, Prosus made a 4.9 billion-pound ($6.4 billion) bid to acquire the British food delivery platform Just Eat Plc. The company’s shares tumbled, reopening the valuation gap to the Tencent holding. Even though Takeaway.com NV ultimately bought Just Eat, Prosus continues to trade at a discount to the value of its assets. The Dutch firm still became Europe’s largest tech company by market capitalization this week after SAP SE shares declined following a profit warning.The buyback ought to provide some reassurance to investors that van Dijk is wary about overspending on deals, though he can always sell more Tencent stock to fund massive acquisitions when a lockup expires next year. Plus they’ll benefit from the reduced share count through greater exposure to the Chinese giant.Van Dijk isn’t so much cutting the Gordian knot as learning to live with it. And that might be what shareholders need.This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.Alex Webb is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Europe’s technology, media and communications industries. He previously covered Apple and other technology companies for Bloomberg News in San Francisco.For more articles like this, please visit us at bloomberg.com/opinionSubscribe now to stay ahead with the most trusted business news source.©2020 Bloomberg L.P.

,

Instant Quote

Enter the Stock Symbol.

Select the Exchange.

Select the Type of Security.

Please enter your First Name.

Please enter your Last Name.

Please enter your phone number.

Please enter your Email Address.

Please enter or select the Total Number of Shares you own.

Please enter or select the Desired Loan Amount you are seeking.

Please select the Loan Purpose.

Please select if you are an Officer/Director.

High West Capital Partners, LLC may only offer certain information to persons who are “Accredited Investors” and/or “Qualified Clients” as those terms are defined under applicable Federal Securities Laws. In order to be an “Accredited Investor” and/or a “Qualified Client”, you must meet the criteria identified in ONE OR MORE of the following categories/paragraphs numbered 1-20 below.

High West Capital Partners, LLC cannot provide you with any information regarding its Loan Programs or Investment Products unless you meet one or more of the following criteria. Furthermore, Foreign nationals who may be exempt from qualifying as a U.S. Accredited Investor are still required to meet the established criteria, in accordance with High West Capital Partners, LLC’s internal lending policies. High West Capital Partners, LLC will not provide information or lend to any individual and/or entity that does not meet one or more of the following criteria:

1) Individual with Net Worth in excess of $1.0 million. A natural person (not an entity) whose net worth, or joint net worth with his or her spouse, at the time of purchase exceeds $1,000,000 USD. (In calculating net worth, you may include your equity in personal property and real estate, including your principal residence, cash, short-term investments, stock and securities. Your inclusion of equity in personal property and real estate should be based on the fair market value of such property less debt secured by such property.)

2) Individual with $200,000 individual Annual Income. A natural person (not an entity) who had individual income of more than $200,000 in each of the preceding two calendar years, and has a reasonable expectation of reaching the same income level in the current year.

3) Individual with $300,000 Joint Annual Income. A natural person (not an entity) who had joint income with his or her spouse in excess of $300,000 in each of the preceding two calendar years, and has a reasonable expectation of reaching the same income level in the current year.

4) Corporations or Partnerships. A corporation, partnership, or similar entity that has in excess of $5 million of assets and was not formed for the specific purpose of acquiring an interest in the Corporation or Partnership.

5) Revocable Trust. A trust that is revocable by its grantors and each of whose grantors is an Accredited Investor as defined in one or more of the other categories/paragraphs numbered herein.

6) Irrevocable Trust. A trust (other than an ERISA plan) that (a)is not revocable by its grantors, (b) has in excess of $5 million of assets, (c) was not formed for the specific purpose of acquiring an interest, and (d) is directed by a person who has such knowledge and experience in financial and business matters that such person is capable of evaluating the merits and risks of an investment in the Trust.

7) IRA or Similar Benefit Plan. An IRA, Keogh or similar benefit plan that covers only a single natural person who is an Accredited Investor, as defined in one or more of the other categories/paragraphs numbered herein.

8) Participant-Directed Employee Benefit Plan Account. A participant-directed employee benefit plan investing at the direction of, and for the account of, a participant who is an Accredited Investor, as that term is defined in one or more of the other categories/paragraphs numbered herein.

9) Other ERISA Plan. An employee benefit plan within the meaning of Title I of the ERISA Act other than a participant-directed plan with total assets in excess of $5 million or for which investment decisions (including the decision to purchase an interest) are made by a bank, registered investment adviser, savings and loan association, or insurance company.

10) Government Benefit Plan. A plan established and maintained by a state, municipality, or any agency of a state or municipality, for the benefit of its employees, with total assets in excess of $5 million.

11) Non-Profit Entity. An organization described in Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, with total assets in excess of $5 million (including endowment, annuity and life income funds), as shown by the organization’s most recent audited financial statements.

12) A bank, as defined in Section 3(a)(2) of the Securities Act (whether acting for its own account or in a fiduciary capacity).

13) A savings and loan association or similar institution, as defined in Section 3(a)(5)(A) of the Securities Act (whether acting for its own account or in a fiduciary capacity).

14) A broker-dealer registered under the Exchange Act.

15) An insurance company, as defined in Section 2(13) of the Securities Act.

16) A “business development company,” as defined in Section 2(a)(48) of the Investment Company Act.

17) A small business investment company licensed under Section 301 (c) or (d) of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958.

18) A “private business development company” as defined in Section 202(a)(22) of the Advisers Act.

19) Executive Officer or Director. A natural person who is an executive officer, director or general partner of the Partnership or the General Partner, and is an Accredited Investor as that term is defined in one or more of the categories/paragraphs numbered herein.

20) Entity Owned Entirely By Accredited Investors. A corporation, partnership, private investment company or similar entity each of whose equity owners is a natural person who is an Accredited Investor, as that term is defined in one or more of the categories/paragraphs numbered herein.

Please read the notice above and check the box below to continue.

Singapore

168 Robinson Road,
Capital Tower, Singapore 068912
+65 3105 1295

Taiwan

5th Floor, No. 1-8, Section 5, Zhongxiao East Road, Taipei

Hong Kong

R91, 3rd Floor,
Eton Tower, 8 Hysan Ave.
Causeway Bay, Hong Kong
+852 3002 4462

Australia

44 Martin Place, Sydney 2000 Australia
+02 8319 3232

Indonesia

Millennium Centennial Center, 38th Floor, Jl. Jend. Sudirman Kav. 25
Jakarta 12920, Indonesia

Market Coverage