This Analyst Calls Nikola a “Prove Me Story” — But So Far, Nikola Hasn’t Proven Much, , on November 11, 2020 at 5:00 pm

By
On November 11, 2020
Tags:

From $10 a share in April to nearly $80 a share in June, and back to $18 a share by Tuesday’s closing trade, would-be electric truck-maker Nikola Corporation (NKLA) seems intent on pulling a 360 and taking its stock all the way back to where it began.But one analyst isn’t willing to come along for the ride.Wedbush analyst Daniel Ives took a look under the hood at Nikola’s Q3 2020 earnings report, which was released Monday. Unfortunately for investors who’ve hitched their wagon to this stock, he didn’t like what he saw — and so Ives reiterated his “underperform” rating on the stock, and his $15 price target on Nikola shares. (To watch Ives’ track record, click here)What didn’t he like, specifically? Ives starts out charitably enough, tactfully referring to Nikola as a “pre-revenue company.” (Which is a nice way of saying they haven’t sold anything yet, and may not even have a product to sell). Such lack of a product might ordinarily be reason enough for investors to reject Nikola stock out of hand, and move on in search of brighter prospects. But Nikola has an ace up its sleeve in the form of General Motors, which in September announced that it is investing $2 billion in Nikola, taking an 11% ownership stake in the company, and agreeing to help Nikola build its ballyhooed “Badger” hydrogen fuel cell-powered pickup truck, aiming to bring it to market in late 2022.So long as GM expresses faith in Nikola, investors can take at least some comfort in the fact that while they might be mistaken in investing in the company, GM and its team of due diligence lawyers will not. If GM likes Nikola, so the theory goes, then there must certainly be a “there” there.But is there? Really?Ives agrees that the GM partnership is the “linchpin” in the Nikola buy thesis at this point. However, he also points out that this deal won’t be officially signed before early December. Given the importance of the relationship, it would have been nice to get some confirmation that Nikola is making progress finalizing the deal. But in fact, says Ives, “that did not happen.” When you consider that Nikola’s stock price has fallen by nearly half since this partnership was announced, at the very least, there would appear to be a risk that GM will want to renegotiate the amount of money it is investing, the number of shares it will receive — or both.Moreover, Ives expressed doubts about both the timeline and the execution of Nikola’s plans to (a) build an “Arizona flagship factory” to produce hydrogen fuel cell semi-trucks, and (b) complete a set of five “prototype trucks in Germany.” In theory at least, all five of the prototype trucks are supposed to be finished by the end of this year (says Nikola). But in the absence of founder Trevor Milton — and despite his replacement by Mark Russell as CEO and GM exec Stephen Girsky as Chairman — Ives worries that “execution risks for Nikola are significantly heightened.”With no profits, and even no revenues upon which to hang a valuation for the stock, Ives is forced to conclude that “NKLA is a prove me story,” and a risky investment for individual investors.Is the rest of the Street in agreement? As it turns out, the analyst consensus is more of a mixed bag. 2 Buy ratings, 2 Holds and 1 Sell were assigned in the last three months, giving NKLA a Hold status. However, with a $38.50 average price target, there’s nearly 95% upside from current levels. (See NKLA stock analysis)To find good ideas for stocks trading at attractive valuations, visit TipRanks’ Best Stocks to Buy, a newly launched tool that unites all of TipRanks’ equity insights.Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the featured analyst. The content is intended to be used for informational purposes only. It is very important to do your own analysis before making any investment.,

This Analyst Calls Nikola a “Prove Me Story” — But So Far, Nikola Hasn’t Proven MuchFrom $10 a share in April to nearly $80 a share in June, and back to $18 a share by Tuesday’s closing trade, would-be electric truck-maker Nikola Corporation (NKLA) seems intent on pulling a 360 and taking its stock all the way back to where it began.But one analyst isn’t willing to come along for the ride.Wedbush analyst Daniel Ives took a look under the hood at Nikola’s Q3 2020 earnings report, which was released Monday. Unfortunately for investors who’ve hitched their wagon to this stock, he didn’t like what he saw — and so Ives reiterated his “underperform” rating on the stock, and his $15 price target on Nikola shares. (To watch Ives’ track record, click here)What didn’t he like, specifically? Ives starts out charitably enough, tactfully referring to Nikola as a “pre-revenue company.” (Which is a nice way of saying they haven’t sold anything yet, and may not even have a product to sell). Such lack of a product might ordinarily be reason enough for investors to reject Nikola stock out of hand, and move on in search of brighter prospects. But Nikola has an ace up its sleeve in the form of General Motors, which in September announced that it is investing $2 billion in Nikola, taking an 11% ownership stake in the company, and agreeing to help Nikola build its ballyhooed “Badger” hydrogen fuel cell-powered pickup truck, aiming to bring it to market in late 2022.So long as GM expresses faith in Nikola, investors can take at least some comfort in the fact that while they might be mistaken in investing in the company, GM and its team of due diligence lawyers will not. If GM likes Nikola, so the theory goes, then there must certainly be a “there” there.But is there? Really?Ives agrees that the GM partnership is the “linchpin” in the Nikola buy thesis at this point. However, he also points out that this deal won’t be officially signed before early December. Given the importance of the relationship, it would have been nice to get some confirmation that Nikola is making progress finalizing the deal. But in fact, says Ives, “that did not happen.” When you consider that Nikola’s stock price has fallen by nearly half since this partnership was announced, at the very least, there would appear to be a risk that GM will want to renegotiate the amount of money it is investing, the number of shares it will receive — or both.Moreover, Ives expressed doubts about both the timeline and the execution of Nikola’s plans to (a) build an “Arizona flagship factory” to produce hydrogen fuel cell semi-trucks, and (b) complete a set of five “prototype trucks in Germany.” In theory at least, all five of the prototype trucks are supposed to be finished by the end of this year (says Nikola). But in the absence of founder Trevor Milton — and despite his replacement by Mark Russell as CEO and GM exec Stephen Girsky as Chairman — Ives worries that “execution risks for Nikola are significantly heightened.”With no profits, and even no revenues upon which to hang a valuation for the stock, Ives is forced to conclude that “NKLA is a prove me story,” and a risky investment for individual investors.Is the rest of the Street in agreement? As it turns out, the analyst consensus is more of a mixed bag. 2 Buy ratings, 2 Holds and 1 Sell were assigned in the last three months, giving NKLA a Hold status. However, with a $38.50 average price target, there’s nearly 95% upside from current levels. (See NKLA stock analysis)To find good ideas for stocks trading at attractive valuations, visit TipRanks’ Best Stocks to Buy, a newly launched tool that unites all of TipRanks’ equity insights.Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the featured analyst. The content is intended to be used for informational purposes only. It is very important to do your own analysis before making any investment.

,

Instant Quote

Enter the Stock Symbol.

Select the Exchange.

Select the Type of Security.

Please enter your First Name.

Please enter your Last Name.

Please enter your phone number.

Please enter your Email Address.

Please enter or select the Total Number of Shares you own.

Please enter or select the Desired Loan Amount you are seeking.

Please select the Loan Purpose.

Please select if you are an Officer/Director.

High West Capital Partners, LLC may only offer certain information to persons who are “Accredited Investors” and/or “Qualified Clients” as those terms are defined under applicable Federal Securities Laws. In order to be an “Accredited Investor” and/or a “Qualified Client”, you must meet the criteria identified in ONE OR MORE of the following categories/paragraphs numbered 1-20 below.

High West Capital Partners, LLC cannot provide you with any information regarding its Loan Programs or Investment Products unless you meet one or more of the following criteria. Furthermore, Foreign nationals who may be exempt from qualifying as a U.S. Accredited Investor are still required to meet the established criteria, in accordance with High West Capital Partners, LLC’s internal lending policies. High West Capital Partners, LLC will not provide information or lend to any individual and/or entity that does not meet one or more of the following criteria:

1) Individual with Net Worth in excess of $1.0 million. A natural person (not an entity) whose net worth, or joint net worth with his or her spouse, at the time of purchase exceeds $1,000,000 USD. (In calculating net worth, you may include your equity in personal property and real estate, including your principal residence, cash, short-term investments, stock and securities. Your inclusion of equity in personal property and real estate should be based on the fair market value of such property less debt secured by such property.)

2) Individual with $200,000 individual Annual Income. A natural person (not an entity) who had individual income of more than $200,000 in each of the preceding two calendar years, and has a reasonable expectation of reaching the same income level in the current year.

3) Individual with $300,000 Joint Annual Income. A natural person (not an entity) who had joint income with his or her spouse in excess of $300,000 in each of the preceding two calendar years, and has a reasonable expectation of reaching the same income level in the current year.

4) Corporations or Partnerships. A corporation, partnership, or similar entity that has in excess of $5 million of assets and was not formed for the specific purpose of acquiring an interest in the Corporation or Partnership.

5) Revocable Trust. A trust that is revocable by its grantors and each of whose grantors is an Accredited Investor as defined in one or more of the other categories/paragraphs numbered herein.

6) Irrevocable Trust. A trust (other than an ERISA plan) that (a)is not revocable by its grantors, (b) has in excess of $5 million of assets, (c) was not formed for the specific purpose of acquiring an interest, and (d) is directed by a person who has such knowledge and experience in financial and business matters that such person is capable of evaluating the merits and risks of an investment in the Trust.

7) IRA or Similar Benefit Plan. An IRA, Keogh or similar benefit plan that covers only a single natural person who is an Accredited Investor, as defined in one or more of the other categories/paragraphs numbered herein.

8) Participant-Directed Employee Benefit Plan Account. A participant-directed employee benefit plan investing at the direction of, and for the account of, a participant who is an Accredited Investor, as that term is defined in one or more of the other categories/paragraphs numbered herein.

9) Other ERISA Plan. An employee benefit plan within the meaning of Title I of the ERISA Act other than a participant-directed plan with total assets in excess of $5 million or for which investment decisions (including the decision to purchase an interest) are made by a bank, registered investment adviser, savings and loan association, or insurance company.

10) Government Benefit Plan. A plan established and maintained by a state, municipality, or any agency of a state or municipality, for the benefit of its employees, with total assets in excess of $5 million.

11) Non-Profit Entity. An organization described in Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, with total assets in excess of $5 million (including endowment, annuity and life income funds), as shown by the organization’s most recent audited financial statements.

12) A bank, as defined in Section 3(a)(2) of the Securities Act (whether acting for its own account or in a fiduciary capacity).

13) A savings and loan association or similar institution, as defined in Section 3(a)(5)(A) of the Securities Act (whether acting for its own account or in a fiduciary capacity).

14) A broker-dealer registered under the Exchange Act.

15) An insurance company, as defined in Section 2(13) of the Securities Act.

16) A “business development company,” as defined in Section 2(a)(48) of the Investment Company Act.

17) A small business investment company licensed under Section 301 (c) or (d) of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958.

18) A “private business development company” as defined in Section 202(a)(22) of the Advisers Act.

19) Executive Officer or Director. A natural person who is an executive officer, director or general partner of the Partnership or the General Partner, and is an Accredited Investor as that term is defined in one or more of the categories/paragraphs numbered herein.

20) Entity Owned Entirely By Accredited Investors. A corporation, partnership, private investment company or similar entity each of whose equity owners is a natural person who is an Accredited Investor, as that term is defined in one or more of the categories/paragraphs numbered herein.

Please read the notice above and check the box below to continue.

Singapore

168 Robinson Road
#12-01 Capital Tower
Singapore 068912

New York

Coming Soon!

Dubai

Coming Soon!

Market Coverage