Veolia Makes an Offer Engie Shouldn't Refuse, , on September 30, 2020 at 12:46 pm

Financial News
By
On September 30, 2020
In Financial News
Tags:

(Bloomberg Opinion) — Veolia Environnement SA has wisely bettered its first lowball offer for 29.9% of rival water-and-waste firm Suez SA with a seriously sweetened bid that Engie SA — the state-backed utility that owns the stake — will find very hard to refuse. The bigger question is whether it’s enough to get French politics out of the way.The new offer of 18 euros per share represents a 16% increase and values the Suez stake at 3.4 billion euros ($4 billion). Veolia boss Antoine Frerot’s aim isn’t just to stuff Engie shareholders’ mouths with gold, but to remove as much political risk as possible. The company has committed to maintain full employment of Suez workers in France if it manages to swallow the entire company. Plus it’s pledged any takeover would be on a friendly basis after six months of negotiations to reach an agreement. The new price is undeniably attractive. It represents a multiple of 90 times Suez’s projected adjusted earnings this year and 28 times next year’s, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. The earlier 15.50 euro offer proposed undemanding cost savings of only 500 million euros, a sum worth an estimated 1.5% of combined operating costs, according to Barclays. A bid in the high teens, as my colleague Chris Hughes has written, always looked more realistic.While the fairer price should please Engie’s board and shareholders of Suez, whose stock rose as much as 8% on the news, it’s the friendlier tone that will please President Emmanuel Macron and his finance minister, Bruno Le Maire. Tensions are running extremely high between Veolia and Suez’s board, which has resorted to increasingly desperate measures such as a “poison pill” move to block asset sales it says would be terrible for jobs and profits.No French government wants to be lumped with job cuts, angry trade unions and a corporate battle so bitter it could hurt business in the long run.  Frerot looked caught between Suez’s demands for a full takeover and efforts by Le Maire to buy more time to find a solution. His new move represents a compromise: A higher price to seal this first transaction fast, followed by a slow cooling-off period to negotiate with Suez.It’s hard to see why Engie would say no to getting more cash for an asset it has no interest in keeping. The French state, which is Engie’s No. 1 shareholder, would also get more bang for the taxpayer’s buck. And so far Suez, for all its aggressive rhetoric and “crown jewels” tactics, hasn’t come up with an alternative bidder or convincing value proposition.Suez is still trying to convince Engie and the French government to rebuff Frerot’s approach. But its defense has been weak so far. Its fundamentally dim view of Veolia’s attempted stake purchase, along with the political risk and high antitrust hurdles to any full takeover deal, explains why Suez’s shares are still trading below the new 18-euro offer price. The pressure from exasperated Suez shareholders will likely increase, as activist funds are urge the company’s board to engage with Veolia.Given Frerot has shown he can pull off a tactical climb down and reduce the hostility somewhat, there’s an opportunity for his rival to do the same.This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.Lionel Laurent is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering the European Union and France. He worked previously at Reuters and Forbes.For more articles like this, please visit us at bloomberg.com/opinionSubscribe now to stay ahead with the most trusted business news source.©2020 Bloomberg L.P.,

Veolia Makes an Offer Engie Shouldn't Refuse(Bloomberg Opinion) — Veolia Environnement SA has wisely bettered its first lowball offer for 29.9% of rival water-and-waste firm Suez SA with a seriously sweetened bid that Engie SA — the state-backed utility that owns the stake — will find very hard to refuse. The bigger question is whether it’s enough to get French politics out of the way.The new offer of 18 euros per share represents a 16% increase and values the Suez stake at 3.4 billion euros ($4 billion). Veolia boss Antoine Frerot’s aim isn’t just to stuff Engie shareholders’ mouths with gold, but to remove as much political risk as possible. The company has committed to maintain full employment of Suez workers in France if it manages to swallow the entire company. Plus it’s pledged any takeover would be on a friendly basis after six months of negotiations to reach an agreement. The new price is undeniably attractive. It represents a multiple of 90 times Suez’s projected adjusted earnings this year and 28 times next year’s, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. The earlier 15.50 euro offer proposed undemanding cost savings of only 500 million euros, a sum worth an estimated 1.5% of combined operating costs, according to Barclays. A bid in the high teens, as my colleague Chris Hughes has written, always looked more realistic.While the fairer price should please Engie’s board and shareholders of Suez, whose stock rose as much as 8% on the news, it’s the friendlier tone that will please President Emmanuel Macron and his finance minister, Bruno Le Maire. Tensions are running extremely high between Veolia and Suez’s board, which has resorted to increasingly desperate measures such as a “poison pill” move to block asset sales it says would be terrible for jobs and profits.No French government wants to be lumped with job cuts, angry trade unions and a corporate battle so bitter it could hurt business in the long run.  Frerot looked caught between Suez’s demands for a full takeover and efforts by Le Maire to buy more time to find a solution. His new move represents a compromise: A higher price to seal this first transaction fast, followed by a slow cooling-off period to negotiate with Suez.It’s hard to see why Engie would say no to getting more cash for an asset it has no interest in keeping. The French state, which is Engie’s No. 1 shareholder, would also get more bang for the taxpayer’s buck. And so far Suez, for all its aggressive rhetoric and “crown jewels” tactics, hasn’t come up with an alternative bidder or convincing value proposition.Suez is still trying to convince Engie and the French government to rebuff Frerot’s approach. But its defense has been weak so far. Its fundamentally dim view of Veolia’s attempted stake purchase, along with the political risk and high antitrust hurdles to any full takeover deal, explains why Suez’s shares are still trading below the new 18-euro offer price. The pressure from exasperated Suez shareholders will likely increase, as activist funds are urge the company’s board to engage with Veolia.Given Frerot has shown he can pull off a tactical climb down and reduce the hostility somewhat, there’s an opportunity for his rival to do the same.This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.Lionel Laurent is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering the European Union and France. He worked previously at Reuters and Forbes.For more articles like this, please visit us at bloomberg.com/opinionSubscribe now to stay ahead with the most trusted business news source.©2020 Bloomberg L.P.

,

Instant Quote

Enter the Stock Symbol.

Select the Exchange.

Select the Type of Security.

Please enter your First Name.

Please enter your Last Name.

Please enter your phone number.

Please enter your Email Address.

Please enter or select the Total Number of Shares you own.

Please enter or select the Desired Loan Amount you are seeking.

Please select the Loan Purpose.

Please select if you are an Officer/Director.

High West Capital Partners, LLC may only offer certain information to persons who are “Accredited Investors” and/or “Qualified Clients” as those terms are defined under applicable Federal Securities Laws. In order to be an “Accredited Investor” and/or a “Qualified Client”, you must meet the criteria identified in ONE OR MORE of the following categories/paragraphs numbered 1-20 below.

High West Capital Partners, LLC cannot provide you with any information regarding its Loan Programs or Investment Products unless you meet one or more of the following criteria. Furthermore, Foreign nationals who may be exempt from qualifying as a U.S. Accredited Investor are still required to meet the established criteria, in accordance with High West Capital Partners, LLC’s internal lending policies. High West Capital Partners, LLC will not provide information or lend to any individual and/or entity that does not meet one or more of the following criteria:

1) Individual with Net Worth in excess of $1.0 million. A natural person (not an entity) whose net worth, or joint net worth with his or her spouse, at the time of purchase exceeds $1,000,000 USD. (In calculating net worth, you may include your equity in personal property and real estate, including your principal residence, cash, short-term investments, stock and securities. Your inclusion of equity in personal property and real estate should be based on the fair market value of such property less debt secured by such property.)

2) Individual with $200,000 individual Annual Income. A natural person (not an entity) who had individual income of more than $200,000 in each of the preceding two calendar years, and has a reasonable expectation of reaching the same income level in the current year.

3) Individual with $300,000 Joint Annual Income. A natural person (not an entity) who had joint income with his or her spouse in excess of $300,000 in each of the preceding two calendar years, and has a reasonable expectation of reaching the same income level in the current year.

4) Corporations or Partnerships. A corporation, partnership, or similar entity that has in excess of $5 million of assets and was not formed for the specific purpose of acquiring an interest in the Corporation or Partnership.

5) Revocable Trust. A trust that is revocable by its grantors and each of whose grantors is an Accredited Investor as defined in one or more of the other categories/paragraphs numbered herein.

6) Irrevocable Trust. A trust (other than an ERISA plan) that (a)is not revocable by its grantors, (b) has in excess of $5 million of assets, (c) was not formed for the specific purpose of acquiring an interest, and (d) is directed by a person who has such knowledge and experience in financial and business matters that such person is capable of evaluating the merits and risks of an investment in the Trust.

7) IRA or Similar Benefit Plan. An IRA, Keogh or similar benefit plan that covers only a single natural person who is an Accredited Investor, as defined in one or more of the other categories/paragraphs numbered herein.

8) Participant-Directed Employee Benefit Plan Account. A participant-directed employee benefit plan investing at the direction of, and for the account of, a participant who is an Accredited Investor, as that term is defined in one or more of the other categories/paragraphs numbered herein.

9) Other ERISA Plan. An employee benefit plan within the meaning of Title I of the ERISA Act other than a participant-directed plan with total assets in excess of $5 million or for which investment decisions (including the decision to purchase an interest) are made by a bank, registered investment adviser, savings and loan association, or insurance company.

10) Government Benefit Plan. A plan established and maintained by a state, municipality, or any agency of a state or municipality, for the benefit of its employees, with total assets in excess of $5 million.

11) Non-Profit Entity. An organization described in Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, with total assets in excess of $5 million (including endowment, annuity and life income funds), as shown by the organization’s most recent audited financial statements.

12) A bank, as defined in Section 3(a)(2) of the Securities Act (whether acting for its own account or in a fiduciary capacity).

13) A savings and loan association or similar institution, as defined in Section 3(a)(5)(A) of the Securities Act (whether acting for its own account or in a fiduciary capacity).

14) A broker-dealer registered under the Exchange Act.

15) An insurance company, as defined in Section 2(13) of the Securities Act.

16) A “business development company,” as defined in Section 2(a)(48) of the Investment Company Act.

17) A small business investment company licensed under Section 301 (c) or (d) of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958.

18) A “private business development company” as defined in Section 202(a)(22) of the Advisers Act.

19) Executive Officer or Director. A natural person who is an executive officer, director or general partner of the Partnership or the General Partner, and is an Accredited Investor as that term is defined in one or more of the categories/paragraphs numbered herein.

20) Entity Owned Entirely By Accredited Investors. A corporation, partnership, private investment company or similar entity each of whose equity owners is a natural person who is an Accredited Investor, as that term is defined in one or more of the categories/paragraphs numbered herein.

Please read the notice above and check the box below to continue.

Singapore

168 Robinson Road,
Capital Tower, Singapore 068912
+65 3105 1295

Taiwan

5th Floor, No. 1-8, Section 5, Zhongxiao East Road, Taipei

Hong Kong

R91, 3rd Floor,
Eton Tower, 8 Hysan Ave.
Causeway Bay, Hong Kong
+852 3002 4462

Australia

44 Martin Place, Sydney 2000 Australia
+02 8319 3232

Indonesia

Millennium Centennial Center, 38th Floor, Jl. Jend. Sudirman Kav. 25
Jakarta 12920, Indonesia

Market Coverage