William Hill Faces Breakup After Accepting Caesars Bid, , on September 30, 2020 at 9:35 am

Financial News
By
On September 30, 2020
In Financial News
Tags:

(Bloomberg) — William Hill Plc has chosen to sell itself to a rival rather than private equity, yet the 2.9 billion pound ($3.7 billion) deal could still end up in a breakup of the U.K. gambling company.Caesars Entertainment Inc.’s takeover bid was accepted by William Hill’s board, according to a statement Wednesday, strengthening its position to expand in the lucrative business of online gaming in the U.S.If its bid is successful, Caesars said its focus would be on London-based William Hill’s American assets and it would “seek suitable partners or owners” for the other businesses, such as the U.K. The British company has been focused on its U.S. operations after the Supreme Court legalized sports betting in 2018, while its older markets have suffered from tighter regulation.Wednesday’s statement looks to have shut out a rival bid from buyout firm Apollo Global Management Inc. From William Hill’s perspective, a deal with Caesars may have been all but inevitable: the companies already operate a joint venture in the U.S., and Caesars said Monday it could terminate aspects of it if Apollo’s approach prevailed.Caesars said the joint venture “needs to be broadened in scope in order to fully maximize the opportunity in the sports betting and gaming sector.” It estimates the U.S. sports and online betting market could be worth as much as $35 billion.Logical Move“It looks like a logical and natural move of consolidation of this round of U.S. brick and mortar players acquiring online knowledge,” Itai Pazner, chief executive officer of online gambling company 888 Holdings Plc, said in an interview on Wednesday. “I see a lot of opportunities in terms of M&A, either bolt-on M&A as we have been doing for the last few years, or something more strategic.”One example of this trend is Flutter Entertainment Plc’s purchase of the Stars Group Inc., which it completed in May.Though William Hill benefited from its U.S. presence, it’s been caught by changing rules in its home market. Founded in 1934, its betting shops became ubiquitous around Britain, but hundreds were rendered unprofitable by a 2018 U.K. government crackdown on the stakes companies could charge on betting terminals.Gambling advertising has also been curtailed — some voluntarily by operators — while taxes on online betting have risen. Canceled sporting events and lockdowns due to the pandemic have accelerated store closures.Caesars’s cash offer of 272 pence per William Hill share needs the approval of 75% of the British bookmaker’s shareholders, according to the statement. It’s a 25% premium to William Hill’s closing share price before takeover interest was reported by Bloomberg on Friday.William Hill shares were little changed at 274.3 pence at 10:22 a.m. in London.“William Hill is worth significantly more than the 272p Caesars bid,” Jefferies analyst James Wheatcroft said in a research note. “But with the recently revealed poison pill structure of the JV and now a WMH Board recommendation, Caesars Entertainment is well-placed to realize the full upside.”(Updates with 888 CEO comment in sixth paragraph)For more articles like this, please visit us at bloomberg.comSubscribe now to stay ahead with the most trusted business news source.©2020 Bloomberg L.P.,

William Hill Faces Breakup After Accepting Caesars Bid(Bloomberg) — William Hill Plc has chosen to sell itself to a rival rather than private equity, yet the 2.9 billion pound ($3.7 billion) deal could still end up in a breakup of the U.K. gambling company.Caesars Entertainment Inc.’s takeover bid was accepted by William Hill’s board, according to a statement Wednesday, strengthening its position to expand in the lucrative business of online gaming in the U.S.If its bid is successful, Caesars said its focus would be on London-based William Hill’s American assets and it would “seek suitable partners or owners” for the other businesses, such as the U.K. The British company has been focused on its U.S. operations after the Supreme Court legalized sports betting in 2018, while its older markets have suffered from tighter regulation.Wednesday’s statement looks to have shut out a rival bid from buyout firm Apollo Global Management Inc. From William Hill’s perspective, a deal with Caesars may have been all but inevitable: the companies already operate a joint venture in the U.S., and Caesars said Monday it could terminate aspects of it if Apollo’s approach prevailed.Caesars said the joint venture “needs to be broadened in scope in order to fully maximize the opportunity in the sports betting and gaming sector.” It estimates the U.S. sports and online betting market could be worth as much as $35 billion.Logical Move“It looks like a logical and natural move of consolidation of this round of U.S. brick and mortar players acquiring online knowledge,” Itai Pazner, chief executive officer of online gambling company 888 Holdings Plc, said in an interview on Wednesday. “I see a lot of opportunities in terms of M&A, either bolt-on M&A as we have been doing for the last few years, or something more strategic.”One example of this trend is Flutter Entertainment Plc’s purchase of the Stars Group Inc., which it completed in May.Though William Hill benefited from its U.S. presence, it’s been caught by changing rules in its home market. Founded in 1934, its betting shops became ubiquitous around Britain, but hundreds were rendered unprofitable by a 2018 U.K. government crackdown on the stakes companies could charge on betting terminals.Gambling advertising has also been curtailed — some voluntarily by operators — while taxes on online betting have risen. Canceled sporting events and lockdowns due to the pandemic have accelerated store closures.Caesars’s cash offer of 272 pence per William Hill share needs the approval of 75% of the British bookmaker’s shareholders, according to the statement. It’s a 25% premium to William Hill’s closing share price before takeover interest was reported by Bloomberg on Friday.William Hill shares were little changed at 274.3 pence at 10:22 a.m. in London.“William Hill is worth significantly more than the 272p Caesars bid,” Jefferies analyst James Wheatcroft said in a research note. “But with the recently revealed poison pill structure of the JV and now a WMH Board recommendation, Caesars Entertainment is well-placed to realize the full upside.”(Updates with 888 CEO comment in sixth paragraph)For more articles like this, please visit us at bloomberg.comSubscribe now to stay ahead with the most trusted business news source.©2020 Bloomberg L.P.

,

Instant Quote

Enter the Stock Symbol.

Select the Exchange.

Select the Type of Security.

Please enter your First Name.

Please enter your Last Name.

Please enter your phone number.

Please enter your Email Address.

Please enter or select the Total Number of Shares you own.

Please enter or select the Desired Loan Amount you are seeking.

Please select the Loan Purpose.

Please select if you are an Officer/Director.

High West Capital Partners, LLC may only offer certain information to persons who are “Accredited Investors” and/or “Qualified Clients” as those terms are defined under applicable Federal Securities Laws. In order to be an “Accredited Investor” and/or a “Qualified Client”, you must meet the criteria identified in ONE OR MORE of the following categories/paragraphs numbered 1-20 below.

High West Capital Partners, LLC cannot provide you with any information regarding its Loan Programs or Investment Products unless you meet one or more of the following criteria. Furthermore, Foreign nationals who may be exempt from qualifying as a U.S. Accredited Investor are still required to meet the established criteria, in accordance with High West Capital Partners, LLC’s internal lending policies. High West Capital Partners, LLC will not provide information or lend to any individual and/or entity that does not meet one or more of the following criteria:

1) Individual with Net Worth in excess of $1.0 million. A natural person (not an entity) whose net worth, or joint net worth with his or her spouse, at the time of purchase exceeds $1,000,000 USD. (In calculating net worth, you may include your equity in personal property and real estate, including your principal residence, cash, short-term investments, stock and securities. Your inclusion of equity in personal property and real estate should be based on the fair market value of such property less debt secured by such property.)

2) Individual with $200,000 individual Annual Income. A natural person (not an entity) who had individual income of more than $200,000 in each of the preceding two calendar years, and has a reasonable expectation of reaching the same income level in the current year.

3) Individual with $300,000 Joint Annual Income. A natural person (not an entity) who had joint income with his or her spouse in excess of $300,000 in each of the preceding two calendar years, and has a reasonable expectation of reaching the same income level in the current year.

4) Corporations or Partnerships. A corporation, partnership, or similar entity that has in excess of $5 million of assets and was not formed for the specific purpose of acquiring an interest in the Corporation or Partnership.

5) Revocable Trust. A trust that is revocable by its grantors and each of whose grantors is an Accredited Investor as defined in one or more of the other categories/paragraphs numbered herein.

6) Irrevocable Trust. A trust (other than an ERISA plan) that (a)is not revocable by its grantors, (b) has in excess of $5 million of assets, (c) was not formed for the specific purpose of acquiring an interest, and (d) is directed by a person who has such knowledge and experience in financial and business matters that such person is capable of evaluating the merits and risks of an investment in the Trust.

7) IRA or Similar Benefit Plan. An IRA, Keogh or similar benefit plan that covers only a single natural person who is an Accredited Investor, as defined in one or more of the other categories/paragraphs numbered herein.

8) Participant-Directed Employee Benefit Plan Account. A participant-directed employee benefit plan investing at the direction of, and for the account of, a participant who is an Accredited Investor, as that term is defined in one or more of the other categories/paragraphs numbered herein.

9) Other ERISA Plan. An employee benefit plan within the meaning of Title I of the ERISA Act other than a participant-directed plan with total assets in excess of $5 million or for which investment decisions (including the decision to purchase an interest) are made by a bank, registered investment adviser, savings and loan association, or insurance company.

10) Government Benefit Plan. A plan established and maintained by a state, municipality, or any agency of a state or municipality, for the benefit of its employees, with total assets in excess of $5 million.

11) Non-Profit Entity. An organization described in Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, with total assets in excess of $5 million (including endowment, annuity and life income funds), as shown by the organization’s most recent audited financial statements.

12) A bank, as defined in Section 3(a)(2) of the Securities Act (whether acting for its own account or in a fiduciary capacity).

13) A savings and loan association or similar institution, as defined in Section 3(a)(5)(A) of the Securities Act (whether acting for its own account or in a fiduciary capacity).

14) A broker-dealer registered under the Exchange Act.

15) An insurance company, as defined in Section 2(13) of the Securities Act.

16) A “business development company,” as defined in Section 2(a)(48) of the Investment Company Act.

17) A small business investment company licensed under Section 301 (c) or (d) of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958.

18) A “private business development company” as defined in Section 202(a)(22) of the Advisers Act.

19) Executive Officer or Director. A natural person who is an executive officer, director or general partner of the Partnership or the General Partner, and is an Accredited Investor as that term is defined in one or more of the categories/paragraphs numbered herein.

20) Entity Owned Entirely By Accredited Investors. A corporation, partnership, private investment company or similar entity each of whose equity owners is a natural person who is an Accredited Investor, as that term is defined in one or more of the categories/paragraphs numbered herein.

Please read the notice above and check the box below to continue.

Singapore

+65 3105 1295

Taiwan

Coming Soon!

Hong Kong

R91, 3rd Floor,
Eton Tower, 8 Hysan Ave.
Causeway Bay, Hong Kong
+852 3002 4462

Follow Us

Market Coverage